Science Fiction As a Path to Explore the Future of the Anthropocene and Worlds in Preparation

7 07 2016

Paper (available on request) to be presented at the 3rd ISA Forum of Sociology (“The Futures We Want: Global Sociology and the Struggles for a Better World”) in the Panel “Framing Discourses, Action and Collective Imaginaries about Environmental Issues”, University of Vienna (Austria), Sunday, 10 July 2016.

banner_forum_2016_850-283

Abstract:
Should humanity prepare for life on a less and less habitable planet? As suggested by the term “anthropocene,” visible traces are no longer mere scratches on the planetary surface. If, given the magnitude of human activities, the challenge is to think about their consequences, it is useful to explore what imaginative foundations can be used as a basis for collective reflections. From this point of view, science fiction may have the advantage of having anticipated the movement. By initiating and accumulating thought experiments, it offers a cognitive reservoir and a reflexive medium. Its representations are also a vehicle for interpreting the world. One of the few places where one can see “future generations” live, act and organize is science fiction and its imaginary constructions.
The method proposed here is to consider these fictional works as a form of problematization (in the sense of Michel Foucault). Starting from these bases, the proposed contribution will be organized in three sections. The first will show how science fiction, when it deals with ecological dimensions, can be in its way a problematization of planetary habitability and of issues that underpin the notion of anthropocene. The second will show the limits of the classical divide between utopia and dystopia and propose a reopening of the possible modes of apprehension of imaginable futures, precisely by considering the science fiction narrative as a vector of projective exploration of the future. While defending the idea that it is better to take science fiction productions as lines of flight (in the sense of Gilles Deleuze), the third section will aim at identifying and classifying science fiction that, in environmental matters, searches for new or different directions (particularly compared to the currently dominant model). The contribution will thus seek out adaptation pathways that appear closer to the register of hope.


Actions

Information

7 responses

7 07 2016
zelectron

Si vous faites le tri dans la SF et ne laissez pas de choix aux citoyens autant fahrenheitiser tout les lectures non-agrées en 451 degrés🙂

7 07 2016
Yannick Rumpala

Le temps ou l’espace réduit oblige à sélectionner les exemples, mais la SF est suffisamment vaste pour laisser à chacun la possibilité d’y « trouver son bonheur ».😉

7 07 2016
zelectron

il me souvient de votre réaction négative à propos de « l’ère des biocybs » de Jimmy Guieu qui je vous l’accorde ne méritait pas de figurer au rang des plus grands chef-d’œuvre mais a vulgarisé le mot de biocyb et explicité son concept indépendamment d’une trame romanesque simplette mais sans méchanceté.

7 07 2016
Yannick Rumpala

Pour avoir vu (et apprécié) un certain nombre de dérivés de Ghost in the Shell récemment, je crois que, sur ce sujet, je vais conserver mes préférences.😉

7 07 2016
zelectron

Vous mélangez toujours SF, fantastique et horreur ?

13 07 2016
13 07 2016
Yannick Rumpala

Indeed!

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s




%d blogueurs aiment cette page :